Nick Baumann |
I cover national politics and civil liberties issues for the Washington, DC bureau of Mother Jones. I have also written for The Economist, the Washington Monthly, the Atlantic, and Commonweal. Email me at nbaumann [at] motherjones [dot] com. |
The problem with arguing on the internet, by Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal’s Zach Weiner.
Texts from Hillary ….. dottumblrdotcom
(Source: textsfromhillaryclinton)
Did not realize this had happened.
LA Times ‘wikitorial’ gives editors red faces | Technology | The Guardian
A fan trailer for John Carter that might make you actually want to see the movie.
(Source: youtube.com)
Well, this was a must-share.
Every Wes Anderson Slow-Motion Shot, Set to Ja Rule (by Slacktory, via Spencer Ackerman).
Only two American industries have ever had the clout in Washington to force Congress to ban Wall Street from trading futures on their products. The first is onions—futures trading in no one’s favorite root vegetable was banned in the 1950s after farmers protested that Chicago speculators were manipulating prices. The other ban is more recent: In 2010, at the urging of the Motion Picture Association of America, one of Capitol Hill’s most powerful lobbies, Congress banned movie futures as part of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory reform bill.
The big studios took on Wall Street—which isn’t known for losing lobbying fights—and won. So this month, when all the big entertainment companies joined forces with Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform and the US Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s foremost big business lobby, to fight for sweeping anti-piracy legislation, it was almost a foregone conclusion that they would get what they wanted.
Instead, Big Hollywood lost. Here’s how it happened.
"The internet, distilled.